Blog Layout

R.E.S.P.E.C.T. – How much does an Engineer’s input mean?

Mar 09, 2022

R.E.S.P.E.C.T. – How much does an Engineer’s input mean?

Recently we’ve seen a push to move more of the engineering work onto the truss industry, or broadly speaking the lumber yards, who supply pre-engineered joists (generally APA-PRI series timber i-joists). Seems cheaper, right? After all, they often provide the designs of engineered elements for free…

Well, like most things in life, it isn’t that simple. It is an open secret within the engineering community that truss plates have problems. They can work their way out, they are a natural weak spot in the assemblies, and they are notoriously poor performers when subject to inappropriate handling on site. They also represent significant savings, and will continue to grow into more and more areas of timber frame construction, now even including studs. But is this trend truly to the benefit of most clients? To us it is in fact yet another example of needing to ensure the tool fits the task.

When reviewing shop drawings for a recent project, it was quickly noted that the steel beam sizes we designed had been swapped out to LVL by the lumber yard. That in an of itself was not strange, they are simply offering an option and trying to increase their sales after all, but this time came with a difference. The yard had annotated our drawings and stated that our beams would deflect excessively.

We take such situations very seriously. A second Senior Engineer was assigned to the file, and a thorough review was undertaken. The intern responsible for the work* was called upon to explain and defend their design. The project documentation was reviewed, and the veracity, thoroughness, and correctness of the calculations and original Second Set of Eyes (SSoE) was challenged and confirmed. In short, our design was right.

The matter was brought back to my desk, as I had been the original sealing engineer. I then had a better look at the work of the lumber yard. Turns out most of the new LVL sizes could, most charitably, be called “up selling”. In one case the new design had removed a column and resulted in a multi-ply 24″ deep (~600mm) LVL beam. That’s a heck of a lot of expensive timber, and particularly so when it is replacing a relatively light (and thus inexpensive) steel beam. Current pricing sees clients paying around $2.50 a pound for steel including the fabrication labour. An LVL beam just isn’t always the right choice.

So what did our involvement in this project mean to the client? If we consider the balance of the project being the difference between what would have been purchased without our involvement and what has been purchased with our involvement, the client is paying approximately $12,000 less for the framing after our fees are paid. That’s not at all subtle. Now, clearly this is a larger home with exceptional spans, but the trend continues across many examples. Well engineered buildings have robust load paths, avoid issues which otherwise become all too common (ie: misuse of TECO “hanger” nails, galvanic corrosion, incomplete load paths, soft storey effects, etc.) and save the client time and money.

We specify trusses, LVLs, i-joists, and all the products available at a lumber yard routinely. They are excellent products and surely have their place… But when you’re holding a hammer, everything looks like a nail, and the good and talented staff of your local lumber yard will only sell you products based on lumber. That’s a hell of a set of handcuffs to put on your project!

So: What does an Engineer’s input mean?


R
eliability
E
conomy
S
afety
P
rofessionalism
E
xperience
C
onstructability
T
rust

Like many options clients have before them, an engineer isn’t always the right tool to add to your project team, but if you’re doing something unique or new, you’ll be well served to bring a Professional Engineer on side.

By Maurice Quinn 17 Oct, 2023
If you're familiar with steel design, aluminum might just surprise you, and be a welcome technical challenge...
By Maurice Quinn 13 Oct, 2023
Basic, basics, and drainage - Oh my!
By Maurice Quinn 29 Sep, 2023
At 8:30 EDT, we were notified we had a new P.Eng. on staff...
By Maurice Quinn 13 Jul, 2023
Discounted Forensic Engineering for Ottawa...
By Maurice Quinn 22 Jun, 2023
Engineering the past, Engineering of the past, and the passing of a very fine Engineer...
By Maurice Quinn 17 Jun, 2023
Avoid the most common pitfalls...
By Maurice Quinn 23 Mar, 2023
Limits, estimation, sarcasm, and what we do...
By Maurice Quinn 16 Mar, 2023
What happens when your engineer refuses to look at something?
By Maurice Quinn 09 Feb, 2023
When your infrastructure allows you to be anywhere...
By CEL Team 10 Nov, 2022
Fenestration Canada – Field Testing of Fenestrations The presentation we gave at WinDoor 2022 in Montreal contained the core of our philosophy regarding the testing of fenestration products, and I wanted to repeat this here. We take a very simple approach to such work. This can be broken down as follows: 1. We work within the code. 2. We apply the code referenced standards. 3. We run the test in accordance with those standards. 4. We interpret the results. 5. We diagnose and describe issues. 6. We propose possible causal factors. 7. We propose possible solutions. What don’t we do? i. We never test without calibrated, purpose made, equipment. ii. We don’t test assemblies that aren’t ready (very dirty, blocked weeps, etc.). iii. We don’t fail and walk away. IE: We try to actually find the cause, not just state “you fail”. iv. We provide reports that contain clear explanations, detailed descriptions, and attempt to help the overall successful delivery of the project. v. We look for opportunities to work towards real resolutions, and to limit further failure(s). What is the basis of our work? One word: Understanding. We need to understand the design of your building envelope in order to test it correctly. We need to review the details and be involved in the planning of testing. Not every day is a good day to test, not every assembly should be tested in the same way. We want to prepare a test program that is code and contract conformant that maximizes the accuracy of the test. We want fairness and transparency, not speed and a cookie-cutter repeat of previous testing. I’m told that our presentation will be made available online; I look forward to sharing it with you all. In the meantime, please feel confident that when you reach out to our team for Window Installation Testing to ASTM E1105 under CAN/CSA A440 and the supplement, you’re getting a bespoke product that will serve your needs. We want to be your ally; we will make sure that your installers get the best possible support, that the test isn’t simply a “you failed, better luck next time”, that the project doesn’t mire in the weeds for weeks and months as people point fingers. No; we will work for you, and bring a diligent approach and produce success.  Give us a try: We will test for you, we won’t be looking to fail you.
More Posts
Share by: